Studio100

by • Uploaded: Oct. 16 '08 - Gallerized: Feb. '12

de9af9205f2181283eba95f75d6f1ab0.png

Add to Pad (In 24 Pad s )

Description: A logo designed as an internal branding project for my ad agency. The intent is to brand our internal production studio as a separate entity from our agency so we can bill out in-house services such as retouching and photo shoots to our clients. Unused proposal.
Status: Unused proposal
Viewed: 17127
Share:  

Lets Discuss

janzabransky Oct. 16 '08

I like it ... just question, how it looks in BW? I would say good, too ...

Reply
sdijock Oct. 16 '08

Haven't tried it in BW yet, but I'm sure it'll hold up fine. Thanks janz.

Reply
fogra Oct. 16 '08

This is nice Steve. It's such a strong graphic but it needs to breathe a bit more. Could you possibly update it at about half its current size please?

Reply
sdijock Oct. 16 '08

Sure fogra. Good suggestion.

Reply
fogra Oct. 16 '08

Much better, thanks :)

Reply
sdijock Oct. 16 '08

My pleasure. Thanks for the suggestion.

Reply
logomotive Oct. 16 '08

Nice perspective bro., the 1 bugs me a little seems it needs squared up better but love how you made this work.

Reply
sdijock Oct. 16 '08

Thanks logomotive. The 1 is actually picked up directly from the font family, but I agree with you and think the top of the 1 hangs out a little too much - it almost looks like a %227%22 now that i think about it.**I'll take another look at modifying it and repost. Thanks again.

Reply
sdijock Oct. 17 '08

Ahhh, wait, I see what you're referring to now logomotive. I thought you were reacting to how far out the top of the 1 sticks out, but you were actually referring to the alignment of the 1. Not sure why it appears out of square to you but the alignment and perspective are definitely correct as it's something I painstakingly made sure of. The only thing that might make you think it's off is the spacial relationship between the 1 and the D and O. Even though the type was kerned correctly when flat (before I applied the perspective) the forced perspective makes it seem like there's too much space between them, which might make it appear visually out of square.

Reply
jenlogo Oct. 22 '08

I missed this one. Cool perspective. Very nice Steve :)

Reply
gthobbs Nov. 24 '08

Just realized I had never floated this. I like it mucho.

Reply
sdijock Nov. 25 '08

Thanks gentlemen.

Reply
mar-design.nl May. 14 '09

I like the 3d look of it!

Reply
mentelibre1 May. 14 '09

aaa me ganaste la idea, trabajaba con dos frases con el intento de fusionarlas de esa manera, pero tu resultado es muy muy bueno, a ni modo desechare esa propuesta, felicidades luce muy bien

Reply
sdijock May. 15 '09

@mentelibre1 - Unfortunately, I don't speak Spanish, so I'm not exactly sure what you've said. I do recognize %22bueno%22 from the 2 years of Spanish I took in Jr. High, so I'm assuming you like the logo. If that's the case, then thank you (gracias amigo).

Reply
tass May. 20 '09

i like your concept. not sure how it's going to work at a smaller size but it looks good.

Reply
sdijock May. 21 '09

Thanks tass. The logo is pretty robust so I don't think it'll suffer at smaller sizes. Doesn't really matter though as they went with a different logo in the end.

Reply
andreiu Jun. 23 '09

very cool mark here! congrats!

Reply
JoePrince Jan. 25 '11

Have always really liked this one. Nice work!

Reply
sdijock Jan. 25 '11

Thanks Joe. Means a lot coming from you. Much appreciated!

Reply
AlexWende Jan. 25 '11

don't know why I missed this. This is great!

Reply
sdijock Jan. 25 '11

Thanks for the compliment Alex!

Reply
sdijock Jan. 25 '11

I appreciate all the recent floats. Thanks guys.

Reply
jarodkintz Jun. 20 '11

Wow! your work is amazing. This is such an amazing piece

Reply
itsgareth Feb. 27 '12

Still one of my faves on here

Reply
Type and Signs Feb. 27 '12

amazing ... yes it is !!

Reply
olalb Feb. 27 '12

%3D) amazing work!

Reply
sdijock Feb. 27 '12

Wow! Thanks for feedback everyone! And thanks for the gallery placement David! Much appreciated.

Reply
damaraputra Feb. 27 '12

i'm just curious what will it looks in BW..will you make it? hehe very nice yet original

Reply
hnryhnry Feb. 27 '12

this is strong but still simple..nice work!

Reply
dotflo Feb. 28 '12

missed this one, great work here

Reply
sime Feb. 28 '12

(@ logomotive), sdijock I think he means that the top of the one looks like it is not in perspective - the top should follow the vanishing point of the two zero's behind it (to the right of it) .. at the moment it looks like it follows the vanishing point to the left of the number 'one' :)

Reply
sime Feb. 28 '12

ps.. did you construct this as a true perspective, looks more like an isometric which has then been tweaked.. which may be the reason that the top of the one seems to 'droop' a little?

Reply
sime Feb. 28 '12

@ logomotive... I think he means that the top of the one should follow the vanishing point the right (with the 2 zero's) - at the moment it looks like it follows a vanishing point somewhere to the left of the image*ps.. did you construct this as a true perspective, looks more like an isometric which has then been tweaked.. which may be the reason that the top of the one seems to 'droop' a little?

Reply
sime Feb. 28 '12

oops - sorry for multiple posts still getting the hang of how posting works here and I have a cat!

Reply
sdijock Mar. 04 '12

The perspective for this logo was achieved through the aid of Adobe Illustrator's perspective tool, so it is technically accurate by the standards they've set in their program. It is, however, somewhat of a forced perspective to make the composition more dramatic and dynamic, so maybe that's what some of you are reacting to.

Reply
logomotive Mar. 04 '12

Hi Steve, I think the perspective is perfect! maybe I did not explain my thoughts well enough. I think it's just the type you used here. See how the top of the 1 kinda has a slight curve and how the fron ot 1 (dark side)on same plane as Studio kinda sticks out at a different perspect than the front of Studio (dark side)? That was what I was talking about. Regardless it's really great.

Reply
devey Mar. 04 '12

%5E Exactly. I think if the top of the '1' just came out perpendicularly to the vertical stroke it would be perfect. Awesome concept.

Reply
sdijock Mar. 04 '12

Thanks again Mike. I really respect your opionion and appreciate your feedback.**Thank you too devey.

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy